This is a mirror of the original BitMEX trollbox archive that used to be online here.
BitMEX disabled their archive after the DDOS attack so I have decided to make my mirror publicly available.

Well now, a few days after I made this mirror available to the public, the original archive from BitMEX is online again.
But since it is still limited (neutered to the last few hundred messages) I will keep my FULL mirror alive.

You have access to more than 50 million trollbox posts. This is more than 7 gigabyte of data hosted on a $5 server so please be patient or consider a donation

<<  >>  English  中文  Русский  한국어  日本語  Español  Français 
[2016-07-20 12:15:06] blackwhite : laisee: lol
[2016-07-20 12:15:35] blackwhite : fundamentals on something which doesn't solve any need
[2016-07-20 12:24:38] men : eth doesn't have sense.. why price go up? xD
[2016-07-20 12:29:36] laisee : blackwhite: rumours of a successful h/fork = fundamentals for alt coin.
[2016-07-20 12:32:20] Dirk83 : BitMEX_Wally: Thanks :D working again
[2016-07-20 12:36:33] blackwhite : laisee: yeah, fk the decentraliastion, fk the contracts
[2016-07-20 12:37:00] blackwhite : save the investors
[2016-07-20 12:37:42] blackwhite : establishment guys in black suits
[2016-07-20 12:38:34] bernx : All alts just drops buy support
[2016-07-20 12:38:42] bernx : It's all come for ETH
[2016-07-20 12:47:04] elmorte : What happens to the DAO that's on the exchanges after the fork?
[2016-07-20 12:52:44] dirk__ : {"jse_shortmsg":"BitMEX.executeRequest() HTTP status code 400 returned from POST request to url https://www.bitmex.com/api/v1/order with method order and params {\"symbol\":\"ETHXBT\",\"quantity\":-1038,\"price\":0.01834,\"type\":\"Limit\",\"timeInForce\":\"GTC\"}","jse_summary":"BitMEX.executeRequest() HTTP status code 400 returned from POST request to url https://www.bitmex.com/api/v1/order with method order and params {\"symbol\"
[2016-07-20 12:52:52] dirk__ : what am I sending wrongly here?
[2016-07-20 12:58:11] proofOfTwerk : are you sure all the escaping is necessary?
[2016-07-20 12:59:01] proofOfTwerk : it may be, but just a guess since nobody is saying anything.. it would be like {"symbol":"ETHXBT", ...
[2016-07-20 13:02:51] Dirk83 : yes, it's return from the API
[2016-07-20 13:03:11] Dirk83 : but 400 means
[2016-07-20 13:03:15] Dirk83 : that I am sending something wrong
[2016-07-20 13:03:21] Dirk83 : but most of the time it works
[2016-07-20 13:03:28] Dirk83 : but I get banned because of these I think
[2016-07-20 13:03:39] Dirk83 : but not sure what I am sending wrong
[2016-07-20 13:03:47] proofOfTwerk : ah okay.. connection issue perhaps
[2016-07-20 13:04:07] proofOfTwerk : haven't used their api yet
[2016-07-20 13:14:23] subjective : talk about HF drama, dump starts
[2016-07-20 13:14:40] elmorte : There's like minutes left only..
[2016-07-20 13:24:36] elmorte : Looks like a pretty clean switch
[2016-07-20 13:26:37] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETHXBT`: Buy 2595 @ 0.01847
[2016-07-20 13:27:22] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETHXBT`: Buy 574 @ 0.01859
[2016-07-20 13:27:22] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETHXBT`: Buy 22 @ 0.01858
[2016-07-20 13:27:37] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETHXBT`: Buy 440 @ 0.01864
[2016-07-20 13:28:01] BitMEX_Sam : Dirk83, we return an error in the body, make sure you read it
[2016-07-20 13:28:37] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETHXBT`: Buy 200 @ 0.01886
[2016-07-20 13:32:30] lockhedge : BitMEX_Sam: Hi, shouldn't the formula for the Interest Rate be `Interest Rate (I) = (Interest Quote Index - Interest Base Index) / 24/Funding Interval`instead of `nterest Rate (I) = (Interest Quote Index - Interest Base Index) / Funding Interval`
[2016-07-20 13:32:46] rapidtrades : so eth is rallying? lol
[2016-07-20 13:34:54] lockhedge : BitMEX_Sam: (in the swaps guide) thx for updating it btw
[2016-07-20 13:37:22] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETHXBT`: Sell 80 @ 0.01883
[2016-07-20 13:37:52] Jj4REAL : lol rekt both ways in 5 mins
[2016-07-20 13:38:52] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETHXBT`: Sell 500 @ 0.01861
[2016-07-20 13:39:48] elmorte : Wow, Eth on Kraken went up to 1963....
[2016-07-20 13:41:27] Jj4REAL : 1 minute sawtooth pattern, thats a new one
[2016-07-20 13:43:17] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETHXBT`: Buy 45 @ 0.01867
[2016-07-20 13:43:27] Jj4REAL : so long now
[2016-07-20 13:43:59] justinlooking : what the fucking fuck
[2016-07-20 13:45:59] BitMEX_Sam : lockhedge: We are assuming the funding interval is quoted in days, not hours - I can see the confusion, I'll clear it up in the next revision
[2016-07-20 13:46:25] bernx : Polo dead
[2016-07-20 13:46:46] rapidtrades : oil crashing
[2016-07-20 13:47:15] rapidtrades : so noone is selling their eth?
[2016-07-20 13:51:52] macios15 : 4k cny btc today
[2016-07-20 13:53:35] Tetsuo : macios15: +1
[2016-07-20 13:53:43] Tetsuo : rapidtrades: -100000
[2016-07-20 13:54:04] rapidtrades : noone cares about ur stupid opinions
[2016-07-20 13:54:55] Tetsuo : : - ( ; not even you??
[2016-07-20 13:56:21] lockhedge : BitMEX_Sam: ok, it should just be consistent with the contract details that currently says Funding Interval = 8h
[2016-07-20 14:06:52] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETHXBT`: Sell 5 @ 0.01833
[2016-07-20 14:07:05] bernx : sorry for you
[2016-07-20 14:07:06] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETHXBT`: Sell 1554 @ 0.01816
[2016-07-20 14:07:36] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETHXBT`: Sell 500 @ 0.01812
[2016-07-20 14:10:20] subjective : REKT bot killing it both ways up and down
[2016-07-20 14:10:24] subjective : all within an hour
[2016-07-20 14:10:47] macios15 : eth crash
[2016-07-20 14:11:08] subjective : VB finished HF and went sky diving..
[2016-07-20 14:25:49] dirk__ : BitMEX_Sam, it is all basically the same
[2016-07-20 14:25:59] dirk__ : {"jse_shortmsg":"BitMEX.executeRequest() HTTP status code 400 returned from POST request to url https://www.bitmex.com/api/v1/order with method order and params {\"symbol\":\"ETHXBT\",\"quantity\":-1038,\"price\":0.01834,\"type\":\"Limit\",\"timeInForce\":\"GTC\"}"
[2016-07-20 14:26:09] dirk__ : ,"jse_summary":"BitMEX.executeRequest() HTTP status code 400 returned from POST request to url https://www.bitmex.com/api/v1/order with method order and params {\"symbol\":\"ETHXBT\",\"quantity\":-1038,\"price\":0.01834,\"type\":\"Limit\",\"timeInForce\":\"GTC\"}"
[2016-07-20 14:26:18] dirk__ : ,"message":"BitMEX.executeRequest() HTTP status code 400 returned from POST request to url https://www.bitmex.com/api/v1/order with method order and params {\"symbol\":\"ETHXBT\",\"quantity\":-1038,\"price\":0.01834,\"type\":\"Limit\",\"timeInForce\":\"GTC\"}","name":400}
[2016-07-20 14:26:36] dirk__ : no specific error
[2016-07-20 14:26:46] dirk__ : other than status code 400
[2016-07-20 14:27:26] BitMEX_Sam : dirk__: Read the body of what is sent back to you
[2016-07-20 14:28:48] dirk__ : ok checking
[2016-07-20 14:30:05] Rado : what ETH crash?
[2016-07-20 14:30:07] Rado : lol
[2016-07-20 14:33:45] rapidtrades : too early to tell....aren't exchanges still waiting for longest chain
[2016-07-20 14:37:57] billz : seems clear that ETHC is dead before it started, already 200 blocks behind
[2016-07-20 14:38:07] yerb : is ET>HXB>T rebalance daily now?
[2016-07-20 14:38:41] BitMEX_Sam : yerb: Yep, see the countdown at the top right
[2016-07-20 14:38:49] dirk__ : Bitmex_Sam:Value of position and orders exceeds position Risk Limit
[2016-07-20 14:38:57] yerb : cool
[2016-07-20 14:39:06] dirk__ : but I have more than enough margin
[2016-07-20 14:40:36] BitMEX_Sam : dirk__: See your risk limit under the leverage selector
[2016-07-20 14:42:10] dirk__ : BitMEX_Sam: Nice, thanks!
[2016-07-20 14:42:15] dirk__ : Think that will solve it
[2016-07-20 14:42:21] dirk__ : hopefully
[2016-07-20 14:47:35] BitMEX_Sam : Yep, should be fine.
[2016-07-20 14:47:44] dirk__ : Bitmex_Sam: does it take time to take effect?
[2016-07-20 14:47:48] BitMEX_Sam : No
[2016-07-20 14:47:57] dirk__ : still having same issues
[2016-07-20 14:48:11] dirk__ : with risk limit way beyond position+open orders
[2016-07-20 14:48:23] BitMEX_Sam : Are you sure it's the same error?
[2016-07-20 14:48:50] dirk__ : yes
[2016-07-20 14:48:53] BitMEX_Sam : And that you set your risk limit on the correct contract?
[2016-07-20 14:48:53] dirk__ : exactly the same
[2016-07-20 14:49:39] dirk__ : :O
[2016-07-20 14:51:13] dirk__ : ok
[2016-07-20 14:51:16] dirk__ : right contract now
[2016-07-20 14:51:20] dirk__ : soryr about that :)
[2016-07-20 14:51:32] BitMEX_Sam : :) No worries, it's a new feature and I understand there might be some confusion
[2016-07-20 14:52:13] dirk__ : :) at least that explains all the bans :D
[2016-07-20 15:05:13] macios15 : btc down eth up lol
[2016-07-20 15:05:35] aethlios : great changes with risk limits, no large dpe from now on.
[2016-07-20 15:07:49] BitMEX_Sam : We are also considering a deleveraging option that will realign incentives
[2016-07-20 15:08:13] BitMEX_Sam : Part of the issue with DPE is that there is not significant disincentive to take risky positions, and doing so may affect all users
[2016-07-20 15:08:34] BitMEX_Sam : A smart deleveraging scheme could deleverage the riskiest users first and leave users with more stable positions alone
[2016-07-20 15:15:01] rapidtrades : nice
[2016-07-20 15:16:42] macios15 : 4k today
[2016-07-20 15:17:19] rapidtrades : shut it
[2016-07-20 15:18:31] rapidtrades : it's just a kneejerk due to eth rallying, these usually don't last
[2016-07-20 15:19:22] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBTUSD`: Sell 142555 @ 666.48 **REKTosaurus** :slot_machine: :moneybag: :fire:
[2016-07-20 15:19:27] macios15 : nice
[2016-07-20 15:19:31] macios15 : told you
[2016-07-20 15:19:33] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBTUSD`: Sell 655 @ 666.09
[2016-07-20 15:19:33] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBTUSD`: Sell 6851 @ 666.30
[2016-07-20 15:19:33] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBTUSD`: Sell 8020 @ 666.02
[2016-07-20 15:19:47] REKT : :roller_coaster: :chart_with_downwards_trend: :japanese_goblin:
[2016-07-20 15:19:47] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBTUSD`: Sell 800 @ 664.91
[2016-07-20 15:19:52] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBTUSD`: Sell 50000 @ 664.33 **EPIC REKT** :unamused: :confounded: :astonished:
[2016-07-20 15:19:52] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBTUSD`: Sell 300 @ 663.67
[2016-07-20 15:20:18] macios15 : lol
[2016-07-20 15:20:21] macios15 : bitmex dead
[2016-07-20 15:21:32] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBTUSD`: Sell 400 @ 661.92
[2016-07-20 15:21:32] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBTUSD`: Sell 22000 @ 662.49 **MEGA-REKT** :boom:
[2016-07-20 15:21:37] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBTUSD`: Sell 1489 @ 661.55
[2016-07-20 15:21:42] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBTUSD`: Sell 72122 @ 661.45 **EPIC REKT** :unamused: :confounded: :astonished:
[2016-07-20 15:22:09] anduck : my money disappeared
[2016-07-20 15:22:13] anduck : what to do
[2016-07-20 15:22:44] anduck : found it! =)
[2016-07-20 15:24:22] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETHXBT`: Buy 2631 @ 0.01886
[2016-07-20 15:35:12] jesperf : i hate when my money disappears :)
[2016-07-20 16:48:40] jesperf : i've had the trollbox to myself for over an hour? guys? hello? are you dead?
[2016-07-20 16:51:19] BitMEX_Sam : Yes
[2016-07-20 16:52:55] mrp1nk : ded af
[2016-07-20 17:05:06] jesperf : wat wat
[2016-07-20 17:05:55] odieoh : also dead here
[2016-07-20 17:07:16] ayy_lmao : 0.3% eth funding lol
[2016-07-20 17:07:28] ayy_lmao : smh
[2016-07-20 17:32:42] justinlooking : hmmm "Fills" pane is misbehaving again
[2016-07-20 17:33:51] justinlooking : i think the intended behaviour is to load the fills for the currently selected contract, and you can get correct data by doing full refresh, but not by switching between contracts
[2016-07-20 17:36:20] justinlooking : eg if on `/app/trade/XBTUSD` and refresh, then Fills gets populated with XBTUSD, but if click to switch to ETHBTC, the Fills data doesn't reload, it still only shows XBTUSD fills, a browser reload does pull ETHBTC fills
[2016-07-20 17:38:07] justinlooking : testnet shows fills across all contracts
[2016-07-20 18:01:17] BitMEX_Greg : justinlooking: I'll try replicate this
[2016-07-20 18:12:07] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETHXBT`: Buy 1750 @ 0.01926
[2016-07-20 18:14:04] ayy_lmao : very nice
[2016-07-20 18:26:37] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETHXBT`: Sell 500 @ 0.01908
[2016-07-20 18:34:32] ayy_lmao : lmao
[2016-07-20 18:34:33] justinlooking : any luck greg? fills from the current login session are showing as expected, but anything prior to current login, has fills segregated by the initially loaded contract
[2016-07-20 18:34:46] ayy_lmao : he literally longed the top
[2016-07-20 18:35:06] ayy_lmao : dude got margin called on spread
[2016-07-20 18:35:41] justinlooking : maybe he's using market stops to enter position?
[2016-07-20 18:36:42] fineregex : where will ethereum go?
[2016-07-20 18:37:00] Tetsuo : moon and beyond?
[2016-07-20 18:37:19] fineregex : ethereum will go for a walk in the park
[2016-07-20 18:39:23] Tetsuo : short BTC/USD , long ETH/BTC --->multiple yachts coke and whores for the rest of your life
[2016-07-20 18:40:19] fineregex : https://bfxdata.com/swaphistory/eth shorts are at an all time high. if shorts get squeezed.....
[2016-07-20 18:40:51] fineregex : why cant we see amount of longs? why are shorts so confident?
[2016-07-20 18:41:46] BitMEX_Sam : justinlooking: The intention is that Fills shows fills for all contracts, not just for the selected contract. There is a bug in the initial data fetcher that is erroneously filtering by contract
[2016-07-20 18:41:51] BitMEX_Sam : I'm deploying a fix for that shortly
[2016-07-20 18:42:32] justinlooking : coolio ty
[2016-07-20 18:43:14] fineregex : Tetsuo: the 1234 order is mine just because im scared of funding rate, better take it while you can
[2016-07-20 18:44:37] Tetsuo : i´ll grab a few
[2016-07-20 18:45:51] fineregex : good :D 77 is mine too
[2016-07-20 18:46:00] Tetsuo : :-)
[2016-07-20 18:46:03] Tetsuo : :-D
[2016-07-20 18:46:32] fineregex : 0.0193 !!!hurry
[2016-07-20 18:46:50] Tetsuo : 66 now
[2016-07-20 18:47:39] fineregex : i got a special one just for you, 0.01919
[2016-07-20 18:47:53] fineregex : good
[2016-07-20 18:48:14] Tetsuo : plz stop shilling me into more buying, thx :-D
[2016-07-20 18:48:42] fineregex : :D
[2016-07-20 18:49:20] fineregex : should i buy back at poloniex for 0.0192?
[2016-07-20 18:49:31] Tetsuo : there´s a nice 1200BTC pump wall for ETH on polo@1895
[2016-07-20 18:49:44] fineregex : 0.15% maker fee :(
[2016-07-20 18:50:09] fineregex : vs. 0.29% funding rate
[2016-07-20 18:50:40] fineregex : yes, considering i need to close poloniex later too, which would be free at bitmex
[2016-07-20 18:50:46] fineregex : .....
[2016-07-20 18:51:04] ayy_lmao : wut
[2016-07-20 18:51:47] fineregex : :D
[2016-07-20 18:54:28] fineregex : sorry, closing isnt free, just maker orders are
[2016-07-20 18:55:02] fineregex : Tetsuo: are you Cream-White-Ox?
[2016-07-20 18:55:10] Tetsuo : no
[2016-07-20 18:55:22] fineregex : Tetsuo: Alabaster-Mire-Tooth?
[2016-07-20 18:56:04] fineregex : https://www.bitmex.com/app/leaderboard i think it would be interesting to talk to him
[2016-07-20 18:56:10] fineregex : being on top of both lists
[2016-07-20 18:56:19] rapidtrades : fineregex:
[2016-07-20 18:56:30] Tetsuo : rapidtrades: -666
[2016-07-20 18:56:48] fineregex : rapidtrades: what?:)
[2016-07-20 18:57:14] fineregex : he turned 8 bitcoins into 315
[2016-07-20 18:57:54] Rado : very nice
[2016-07-20 18:57:59] fineregex : maybe he is "crazy" then?
[2016-07-20 18:58:18] Rado : where is the boso that was trolling yesterday?
[2016-07-20 18:58:19] fineregex : ayy_lmao: are you Alabaster-Mire-Tooth??
[2016-07-20 18:58:39] Rado : that is sledger
[2016-07-20 18:58:47] Tetsuo : 50% of the wall on polo got pulled, only 600 BTC left
[2016-07-20 18:58:58] ayy_lmao : no
[2016-07-20 18:59:07] Rado : I sold my ETH long
[2016-07-20 18:59:17] Rado : from 0.01725
[2016-07-20 18:59:39] fineregex : i have hopes for >0.02 if bitcoin goes down
[2016-07-20 19:01:50] bramo0 : BitMEX_Sam: i tried to buy more contracts instead he filled the margin on other order how did that happend
[2016-07-20 19:02:45] Rado : fineregex: it will go over 0.02 in the next couple of days
[2016-07-20 19:02:49] Rado : my bot is still long
[2016-07-20 19:03:09] Rado : I just did a manual trade and wanted to take profits
[2016-07-20 19:09:13] fineregex : many people may consider both bitcoin and ethereum neither cheap nor too expensive now? but hope for burtsting bubbles?
[2016-07-20 19:10:12] fineregex : why are the sentiment indicators/openorders so long on bitcoin still ?http://www.investing.com/currencies/btc-usd-technical
[2016-07-20 19:14:38] d_ : BitMEX_Sam: Quick question: Why does my liquidation price keep fluctuating? It's not much, but it's concerning because I was under the impression that liquidation price should not be changing at all after an order is filled. Note: I'm using cross margin, and only trading the ETHXBT pair.
[2016-07-20 19:16:29] BitMEX_Sam : Just a moment d_, let me check your account.
[2016-07-20 19:16:34] d_ : Thanks
[2016-07-20 19:17:12] BitMEX_Sam : Are you adding and removing limit orders? Open but unfilled orders still consume margin. They would be canceled in the event of a liquidation, however.
[2016-07-20 19:17:41] d_ : No, this occurs when I have no open limit orders as well.
[2016-07-20 19:18:34] d_ : If you look at it now, it's doing it. From what I've seen, it's only +- 0.0010 fluctuations. Like I said, not much. But I from what I've read and asked about previously, the liquidation price shouldn't be changing.
[2016-07-20 19:20:14] justinlooking : https://onf.lt/8ffd9a2d35
[2016-07-20 19:20:32] BitMEX_Sam : This could be an interaction with withheld profit; I'll ask our engine developer as soon as he's online d_
[2016-07-20 19:20:45] d_ : Cool cool, thanks @BitMEX_Sam
[2016-07-20 19:21:54] yerb : BitMEX_Sam: my numoad licale uses comma for decimal place, could you st the price field to accept either comma as decimal character aswell?
[2016-07-20 19:22:02] yerb : *locale
[2016-07-20 19:22:16] BitMEX_Sam : yerb: It should already (but clearly does not), let me run some tests
[2016-07-20 19:22:25] yerb : thanx
[2016-07-20 19:40:37] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETHXBT`: Buy 5 @ 0.01936
[2016-07-20 20:15:04] jung1 : Rado: your prediction was right
[2016-07-20 20:15:23] BitMEX_Sam : yerb: So, locale on the web, as you probably know, is broken in all sorts of various ways - but I have a preliminary version on Testnet that will respect commas in numbers in Firefox.
[2016-07-20 20:15:35] BitMEX_Sam : It appears proper locale recognition may be broken in Chrome.
[2016-07-20 20:16:14] yerb : i iuse firefox
[2016-07-20 20:16:24] yerb : BitMEX_Sam: so i can test it on testnet?
[2016-07-20 20:16:40] BitMEX_Sam : yerb: Yes, will be live in about 5min
[2016-07-20 20:16:46] yerb : ok
[2016-07-20 20:21:47] yerb : i was thinking that could be done by some javascript code changing comma to period when clicking the buy/sell button
[2016-07-20 20:25:24] yerb : BitMEX_Sam: so i can test it on testnet?
[2016-07-20 20:25:45] BitMEX_Sam : yerb: Should be up now yes
[2016-07-20 20:27:52] yerb : ok
[2016-07-20 20:29:59] yerb : hmm, when i input comma (,) it disables buy/sell buttons
[2016-07-20 20:30:22] yerb : 'testing'
[2016-07-20 20:30:32] yerb : `test code`
[2016-07-20 20:31:22] BitMEX_Sam : Hmm.
[2016-07-20 20:31:26] yerb : `<input type="text" onChange="myFunction(this)"/> <script> function myFunction(e) { e.value=e.value.replace(/,/g, '.') } </script>`
[2016-07-20 20:31:44] BitMEX_Sam : Is your browser locale set to the correct language yerb?
[2016-07-20 20:31:53] BitMEX_Sam : I was testing with norwegian set in the Firefox settings
[2016-07-20 20:31:58] yerb : lemme check
[2016-07-20 20:32:28] yerb : i have Slovenian keyboard locale
[2016-07-20 20:32:32] BitMEX_Sam : http://i.imgur.com/vwLUSuh.jpg
[2016-07-20 20:32:45] yerb : its a windows setting, not browser specific
[2016-07-20 20:33:32] BitMEX_Sam : FF has its own
[2016-07-20 20:33:41] yerb : ok ill check
[2016-07-20 20:33:46] BitMEX_Sam : Preferences -> Content -> Languages
[2016-07-20 20:40:38] jung1 : https://blog.ethereum.org/2016/07/20/hard-fork-completed/ ok so hard fors was completed
[2016-07-20 20:41:18] jung1 : question is if that hf was last one or they will change protocol whenever they want
[2016-07-20 20:41:20] yerb : BitMEX_Sam: i have that set to English [en-us]
[2016-07-20 20:41:37] BitMEX_Sam : yerb: That's probably why, the app is getting English then and doesn't know to attempt to translate
[2016-07-20 20:41:43] BitMEX_Sam : Try adding Slovenian
[2016-07-20 20:41:49] yerb : ok
[2016-07-20 20:43:46] yerb : yeah, now it works
[2016-07-20 20:44:40] yerb : BitMEX_Sam: perfext, thanx
[2016-07-20 20:44:44] BitMEX_Sam : :moneybag: :+1:
[2016-07-20 20:50:27] jung1 : https://twitter.com/bencxr/status/755241138756448256 future is now
[2016-07-20 20:50:36] jung1 : 20 payments in less than 100 ms
[2016-07-20 20:50:46] BitMEX_Sam : We'll see, that was all over localhost as far as I can tell
[2016-07-20 20:51:03] BitMEX_Sam : Glad to see they are making progress though
[2016-07-20 20:51:25] jesperf : can nintendo please hire some of them good coders?
[2016-07-20 20:51:33] BitMEX_Sam : Payment channels are very cool though.
[2016-07-20 20:51:39] BitMEX_Sam : jesperf: Blame Niantic
[2016-07-20 20:52:10] jesperf : i can't abuse mah pokemans
[2016-07-20 20:52:50] jesperf : BitMEX_Sam: that's the beauty of being produced by a big name corp. they always take the blame
[2016-07-20 20:53:23] BitMEX_Sam : Well, licensed, afaik Nintendo had nearly nothing to do with the development
[2016-07-20 20:53:48] BitMEX_Sam : PGo is essentially Ingress with most of its features ripped out, with the exception of battery life so bad it must be Bitcoin mining
[2016-07-20 20:54:45] jesperf : hehe, a long time ago some websites were secretly cpu mining in the background
[2016-07-20 20:54:54] BitMEX_Sam : Yeah that was the output of a few hackathons
[2016-07-20 20:55:01] BitMEX_Sam : It was almost profitable back then
[2016-07-20 20:55:34] BitMEX_Sam : Way back then I wanted to do a bitcointalk bot that would detect iCOs, generate a wallet from a seed & mine every one for a week then shut down
[2016-07-20 20:55:42] BitMEX_Sam : Would have been decent $. Never wrangled up the time to do it
[2016-07-20 20:56:15] jesperf : :D
[2016-07-20 20:56:31] jesperf : seems like an ambitious project though
[2016-07-20 20:56:59] BitMEX_Sam : Dangerous as well, would need to be sandboxed quite well on a VPS provider like AWS
[2016-07-20 20:57:18] BitMEX_Sam : Otherwise you could get rekt like Cryptsy
[2016-07-20 20:57:43] jesperf : they got rekt hard
[2016-07-20 20:57:53] jesperf : i had all my worthless coins there
[2016-07-20 20:57:53] BitMEX_Sam : https://github.com/alerj78/lucky7coin/issues/1 is interesting
[2016-07-20 20:58:22] BitMEX_Sam : I don't blame them too much for having trouble, although they should have been more focused on security. Even managing a reliable connection to the Bitcoin blockchain & those wallets is difficult enough
[2016-07-20 21:02:22] jesperf : wow.. virtualization on a large scale wasn't even hard when cryptsy got looted
[2016-07-20 21:04:12] jesperf : I've been trying to keep up with Docker at my last day job. they're doing great work and there are so many good third party tools
[2016-07-20 21:12:04] BitMEX_Sam : Yeah. I wouldn't trust Docker for this kind of thing in the usual case, unless it was e.g. on SmartOS
[2016-07-20 21:12:25] BitMEX_Sam : But they definitely should have sandboxed each wallet. They ran so many of them, though, I'm sure they just took shortcuts
[2016-07-20 21:25:00] jung1 : damn I forgot my steemit password
[2016-07-20 21:27:01] jesperf : one night I forgot my gmail password
[2016-07-20 21:27:10] jesperf : luckily I remembered the next day :D
[2016-07-20 21:32:29] jesperf : some of the leaderboard nicknames are hilarious
[2016-07-20 21:32:39] justinlooking : ?
[2016-07-20 21:32:50] jesperf : Daisy Coconut Shaker sounds great
[2016-07-20 21:33:01] jesperf : lucky bastard too, 14313% profit
[2016-07-20 21:33:13] jung1 : we are serious traders here
[2016-07-20 21:33:23] jung1 : so we need serious nicknames
[2016-07-20 21:33:37] jesperf : Hot Sticky Wing
[2016-07-20 21:34:10] jesperf : watch out for the Big Fringe Spider
[2016-07-20 21:34:23] justinlooking : lol
[2016-07-20 23:21:29] jung1 : when you go long on eth?
[2016-07-21 00:02:14] jesperf : always right before it crashes
[2016-07-21 00:10:58] jung1 : that makes sense
[2016-07-21 00:17:49] jesperf : it's come to the point where I am considering doing the opposite of what I was planning to do
[2016-07-21 00:18:28] jesperf : and since that doesn't work I mostly stay out
[2016-07-21 02:25:43] fineregex : Quoine has annoying/unfinished interface
[2016-07-21 02:29:42] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBTUSD`: Sell 20000 @ 659.78 **MEGA-REKT** :boom:
[2016-07-21 02:29:48] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBTUSD`: Sell 29500 @ 657.87 **MEGA-REKT** :boom:
[2016-07-21 02:29:48] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBTUSD`: Sell 120 @ 658.33
[2016-07-21 02:29:48] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBTUSD`: Sell 8850 @ 658.88
[2016-07-21 02:52:33] Chimpindeed : hmm
[2016-07-21 03:09:59] 1QaZxSw2 : BitMEX_Sam: so instead of making decent $ with ico, you decided to do bitmex, eh?
[2016-07-21 03:10:24] ayy_lmao : lo
[2016-07-21 03:10:25] ayy_lmao : l
[2016-07-21 03:10:33] rapidtrades : l
[2016-07-21 07:32:51] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETHXBT`: Buy 72 @ 0.01882
[2016-07-21 07:56:04] rapidtrades : http://www.reuters.com/article/us-boj-markets-idUSKCN10032J <<<<< LOL
[2016-07-21 09:15:06] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETHXBT`: Buy 7 @ 0.01892
[2016-07-21 09:31:44] elmorte : What's up peeps
[2016-07-21 09:31:54] elmorte : All quiet on the Western front....
[2016-07-21 09:33:11] rapidtrades : the Yen that's what's up
[2016-07-21 09:34:32] rapidtrades : now i just need some unexpected easing from the ECB today and maybe i can get out of this horrible trade
[2016-07-21 09:46:41] elmorte : How big of positions do you usually keep?
[2016-07-21 10:11:58] rapidtrades : that's classified
[2016-07-21 10:18:26] elmorte : Yeah, I kinda guessed as soon as I pressed enter...but say in relation to your crypto positions?
[2016-07-21 10:19:43] elmorte : My uneducated guess is that positions would be much larger due to lower volatility, but I've never traded forex derivatives
[2016-07-21 10:31:12] rapidtrades : i risk 1-2% in fx and 2-4% in crypto
[2016-07-21 10:31:41] rapidtrades : that is when i follow my rules and don't let a runaway loss like in the eur/jpy
[2016-07-21 10:32:36] rapidtrades : those are per trade % ofc
[2016-07-21 10:39:58] mike1000 : Already asked, but no luck: is it possible (via API) to set trailing stop that is not executed immediately, but sets off at a certain price - like a stop price in simple stop orders. Until the price reaches the stop, the trailing stop should be inactive regardless of price moves. I tried to set up trailing stop limit but it activated immediately as does trailing stop market.
[2016-07-21 10:51:44] rapidtrades : anyone used this site https://cex.io
[2016-07-21 10:52:00] rapidtrades : they say 700k users....are they a mining pool or what
[2016-07-21 10:57:21] elmorte : Looks like they started as one
[2016-07-21 10:57:28] elmorte : Turned into an exchange
[2016-07-21 10:57:30] elmorte : Owner Name : Alex Luts Owner OrgName : CEX.IO LTD Owner Addr : SUITE 319-3, 32 THREADNEEDLE STREET Owner Addr : LONDON Owner Addr : GB
[2016-07-21 10:59:36] rapidtrades : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threadneedle_Street <<<that's some prime real estate
[2016-07-21 10:59:54] elmorte : Yeah, I checked the same damn thing
[2016-07-21 11:00:00] rapidtrades : wonder if its one of those robo-offices
[2016-07-21 11:00:35] elmorte : Whois data doesn't have to be true...as long as no one complains
[2016-07-21 11:15:37] rapidtrades : bitstamp seems to be the least rapey...only 2 docs compared to 3 on other sites plus skype calls etc
[2016-07-21 11:17:21] rapidtrades : 'please hold ur ID next to ur face when you take the photo'
[2016-07-21 11:17:31] rapidtrades : how bout u f*ck off instead?
[2016-07-21 11:27:13] elmorte : polo was OK
[2016-07-21 11:44:31] rapidtrades : can u do SEPA on polo?
[2016-07-21 11:59:31] elmorte : I don't ride horses
[2016-07-21 12:30:08] jesperf : so horses ride you?
[2016-07-21 12:32:28] elmorte : yes. only logical conclusion
[2016-07-21 12:33:52] elmorte : But you shouldn't talk about your mom like that :p
[2016-07-21 12:34:04] jesperf : :'(
[2016-07-21 12:36:33] rapidtrades : cmon Draghi do ur euro magic
[2016-07-21 13:15:52] sq : rapidtrades: r u long?
[2016-07-21 13:15:55] sq : btc
[2016-07-21 14:56:00] elmorte : kat.cr....this fckin guy...
[2016-07-21 15:12:37] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETHXBT`: Sell 1888 @ 0.01816
[2016-07-21 15:48:37] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETHXBT`: Sell 20 @ 0.01816
[2016-07-21 15:54:39] zanza : whatdid I miss? forex is going crazy
[2016-07-21 16:22:43] subjective : Coinbase Added ETH
[2016-07-21 17:44:41] ayy_lmao : coinbase already had eth, all you had to do was use gdax
[2016-07-21 17:44:54] ayy_lmao : now it just a couple clicks easier lol
[2016-07-21 18:35:32] zanza : Apple watch got rekt
[2016-07-21 18:54:13] French_Canadian : eth now available to buy & sell on Coinbase, Moon!!
[2016-07-21 19:17:32] zanza : /r/bitcoin isn't running the story lol
[2016-07-21 19:17:47] zanza : they only run negative ETH news
[2016-07-21 19:58:46] jung1 : damn Im gonna write bot and set up 666 as base bitcoin price
[2016-07-21 20:00:48] jung1 : https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCCNY/QsL7obAs-Wave-Y-almost-over/
[2016-07-21 20:01:30] jung1 : Marketcap holding at 10B+, equal to the 2013 ATH. I think we're range bound a while longer before the market cap goes x10 or more. This is Similar to Dec 2012 -> Nov 2013
[2016-07-21 20:13:44] odieoh : what if ETF?
[2016-07-21 20:29:53] jung1 : coinbase add eth
[2016-07-21 20:48:39] Tetsuo : Rumour is that Coinbase will delist BTC soon if it doens´t get hardforked soon! BTC network is on the verge of collapse!
[2016-07-21 20:49:34] Tetsuo : It´s lookin really bad for crypto 1.0
[2016-07-21 20:49:51] ayy_lmao : lol
[2016-07-21 20:49:58] ayy_lmao : testuo for president
[2016-07-21 20:50:38] odieoh : I heard Stephan Tual is going to take over the Ethereum foundation and write all the code from now on
[2016-07-21 20:51:30] zanza : rofl the DAO disaster
[2016-07-21 20:52:48] French_Canadian : Go eth go!
[2016-07-21 21:02:25] jung1 : https://poloniex.com/exchange#btc_dao
[2016-07-21 21:02:27] jung1 : On or before July 23rd, we will provide a tool that you can use to convert your DAO to ETH. The rate of conversion will remain 1 ETH for every 100 DAO.
[2016-07-21 21:09:38] odieoh : In the "recent trades," why are some trades in black as opposed to red or green?
[2016-07-21 21:10:09] ayy_lmao : didnt change price
[2016-07-21 21:10:27] ayy_lmao : it only show green and red if price moved
[2016-07-21 21:24:59] odieoh : thx
[2016-07-21 21:31:57] jung1 : but could be fun to trade dao on polo now
[2016-07-21 21:32:06] jung1 : price will follow eth/100
[2016-07-21 21:46:39] 1QaZxSw2 : so its true, eth is still alive
[2016-07-21 21:51:18] bernx : 0.01888 enty and liq 0.01911
[2016-07-21 21:51:20] bernx : what?
[2016-07-21 21:51:50] bernx : 0.0003 and liq?
[2016-07-21 21:52:52] BitMEX_Sam : bernx: That seems perfectly reasonable if you're on high leverage
[2016-07-21 21:53:17] BitMEX_Sam : 0.01911 - 0.018888 = 0.00023
[2016-07-21 21:53:33] bernx : And this is legit?
[2016-07-21 21:53:51] Tetsuo : legit as fuck
[2016-07-21 21:53:53] bernx : maxumim leverage 66x, but there is 0.00023
[2016-07-21 21:53:59] bernx : and liq
[2016-07-21 21:54:25] ayy_lmao : thats the price you pay for leverage
[2016-07-21 21:54:52] claw : such a double edged sword
[2016-07-21 21:55:09] ayy_lmao : figuratively
[2016-07-21 21:55:48] ayy_lmao : where are you getting 66x?
[2016-07-21 22:02:09] odieoh : do the math on how much the total dollar value of your position changed from open to close and I think you'll see why. Small numbers x very large numbers = pretty large numbers.
[2016-07-21 22:03:01] BitMEX_Sam : Your entry price is averaged out as well, so it may be unintuitive compared to your liquidation price depending on rebalances + how you've assigned margin
[2016-07-21 22:03:26] BitMEX_Sam : As well as how your position has changed in size through the orders you've placed
[2016-07-21 22:04:05] BitMEX_Sam : On a new 33x position with an entry of 0.01799, the liq price would be 0.01915, for example.
[2016-07-21 22:04:44] ayy_lmao : ah yes i forgot
[2016-07-21 22:05:01] ayy_lmao : leverage increases as soon as you start losing
[2016-07-21 22:05:04] ayy_lmao : until rekt
[2016-07-21 22:05:53] bernx : BitMEX_Sam: yes, you right. but, there is entry 1888 and liq 1912
[2016-07-21 22:06:13] bernx : BitMEX_Sam: there is not even close like 179 and 191
[2016-07-21 22:06:44] BitMEX_Sam : move the leverage slider to 25x and back to 33.3x if you want to reassign margin
[2016-07-21 22:06:56] BitMEX_Sam : That will fill your position back up to 33.3x
[2016-07-21 22:09:47] jung1 : http://www.coindesk.com/dao-stakeholders-begin-withdrawing-their-ethers/
[2016-07-21 22:42:41] jung1 : ok lets try 4200cny and go to the moon
[2016-07-21 22:42:51] jung1 : all you guys have my permission
[2016-07-21 23:34:46] jung1 : https://spacebtc.com/ nice
[2016-07-21 23:38:04] Rado : jung1: my bot sold ETH long
[2016-07-21 23:38:55] Rado : I now have a manual short from 1911
[2016-07-21 23:40:03] Rado : I also got back my ETH from DAO tokens and sold for BTC
[2016-07-21 23:40:30] Rado : only 5000 DAO around 1btc
[2016-07-21 23:42:23] jung1 : yeah dao is dead
[2016-07-21 23:42:31] jung1 : people just keep the price until they will be able to convert them
[2016-07-21 23:43:49] Rado : If most of them do what I did we will see a lot lower prices for ETH
[2016-07-21 23:45:04] Rado : The initial advance was because DAO issue was resolved, but now I think we will get a bit of a downtrend
[2016-07-21 23:45:44] ayy_lmao : rado, ur the guy with the 300% return eth bot
[2016-07-21 23:45:56] ayy_lmao : ?
[2016-07-21 23:46:42] bmxalgobtc : but dumb enough to invest in DAO ?
[2016-07-21 23:46:56] ayy_lmao : shots fired
[2016-07-21 23:47:38] bmxalgobtc : whoever invested in dao certainly deserved what almost happened to them
[2016-07-21 23:47:47] ayy_lmao : to be fair, he could have bought DAO after the hack in hopes for hard fork
[2016-07-21 23:59:11] jung1 : too bad that there is no place to short dao
[2016-07-22 00:03:38] odieoh : now or before? Now would just be the same as shorting Eth wouldn't it?
[2016-07-22 00:04:56] jung1 : no
[2016-07-22 00:05:12] jung1 : will be same until all dao will be unlocked
[2016-07-22 00:07:12] ayy_lmao : y not? you will always be able to get 1 eth per 100 dao tho
[2016-07-22 00:12:00] jung1 : maybe you are right
[2016-07-22 00:12:10] jung1 : Rado: coinbase just added eth
[2016-07-22 00:13:19] 1QaZxSw2 : eth spot?
[2016-07-22 00:13:42] 1QaZxSw2 : how come polo adds a new instrument in 4 hrs and it takes coinbase 4 months
[2016-07-22 00:13:53] 1QaZxSw2 : must be AML/KYC
[2016-07-22 00:21:25] jung1 : yeah
[2016-07-22 00:21:38] jung1 : eth is here to stay
[2016-07-22 00:32:30] jung1 : damn that https://steemit.com is crazy
[2016-07-22 00:32:39] jung1 : people recive 20k$ for blog post
[2016-07-22 00:40:28] ayy_lmao : total scam tho
[2016-07-22 00:40:33] ayy_lmao : u can only get a portion of that
[2016-07-22 00:46:46] odieoh : how come?
[2016-07-22 00:47:44] jung1 : they premine steem dollars
[2016-07-22 00:48:22] jung1 : and you recived it from other users as upvotes
[2016-07-22 00:48:26] jung1 : https://poloniex.com/exchange#btc_steem
[2016-07-22 00:48:33] jung1 : you can sell it here
[2016-07-22 00:49:30] odieoh : can you short it?
[2016-07-22 00:49:37] jung1 : not yet
[2016-07-22 00:49:46] odieoh : looks like a juicy short
[2016-07-22 00:49:49] jung1 : but its already 3rd biggest market cap
[2016-07-22 00:50:05] jung1 : and have more transactions than eth
[2016-07-22 00:50:16] jung1 : yeah long term its not good investment
[2016-07-22 00:50:23] jung1 : but idea is quite cool
[2016-07-22 00:50:38] jung1 : no censorship, everything on blockchain
[2016-07-22 00:50:47] odieoh : I'm interested to see how Augur will do
[2016-07-22 00:50:49] jung1 : and you can earn some money from it
[2016-07-22 01:25:19] Rado : ayy_lmao: I have two instances of my ETH bot. One is up 100% one is up 150%
[2016-07-22 01:25:59] Rado : jung1: I thought Coinbase had ETH already
[2016-07-22 01:26:21] Rado : I don't have accounts there and don't get the GDAX/Coinbase difference
[2016-07-22 01:27:01] jung1 : https://blog.coinbase.com/2016/07/21/coinbase-adds-support-for-ethereum/
[2016-07-22 01:30:24] Rado : CHINA SETS YUAN FIXING AT 6.6669
[2016-07-22 01:31:00] Rado : jung1: thanks
[2016-07-22 01:31:40] Rado : Here is a wild (stupid) speculation
[2016-07-22 01:31:54] Rado : Yuan is now 6.66 and BTC is $666
[2016-07-22 01:32:18] Rado : If Yuan devalues to 8 or 9 BTC will go to $800 or $900
[2016-07-22 01:32:34] Rado : lol
[2016-07-22 01:32:40] Rado : doesn't make much sense
[2016-07-22 01:32:56] Rado : BTC will probably way higher if Yuan goes to 9
[2016-07-22 01:33:34] jung1 : yeah 666 is awesome
[2016-07-22 01:33:51] jung1 : it could be bitcoin new base price
[2016-07-22 02:12:50] jung1 : Mycelium Announces Dash Integration Come October 2016
[2016-07-22 02:13:10] jung1 : worth to invest in
[2016-07-22 02:15:27] jung1 : Rado: http://iknowfirst.com/pr-july-21-i-know-first-using-ai-and-ml-algorithms-to-predict-financial-markets
[2016-07-22 02:21:07] Rado : jung1: looks really interesting
[2016-07-22 02:21:19] Rado : where do you find all this shit? :-)
[2016-07-22 02:29:57] fineregex : odieoh: liquid steem has inflation of 100% / year
[2016-07-22 02:31:39] fineregex : shorts interest rates will be higher than other currencies
[2016-07-22 02:32:26] fineregex : "steem power" (investment, paying back ~1%/week) has no inflation
[2016-07-22 02:33:18] fineregex : it is against speculation
[2016-07-22 02:49:13] jung1 : Rado: cant tell you ;)
[2016-07-22 02:49:22] Rado : lol
[2016-07-22 02:49:50] Rado : I got stopped out on my last two XBTUSD trades
[2016-07-22 02:50:02] Rado : hopefully this one will work better
[2016-07-22 03:21:06] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETHXBT`: Sell 350 @ 0.01877
[2016-07-22 03:37:31] jung1 : Rado: https://medium.freecodecamp.com/the-data-dont-lie-here-are-the-50-best-free-online-university-courses-of-all-time-b2d9a64edfac#.1yn75f4hx
[2016-07-22 04:02:37] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETHXBT`: Buy 1170 @ 0.01895
[2016-07-22 04:23:58] Skuffone : can anyone give me a quick low down on fees for XBT?
[2016-07-22 04:26:04] BitMEX_Wally : https://www.bitmex.com/app/fees
[2016-07-22 04:26:57] BitMEX_Wally : If you go long 1 Bitcoin by trading immediately against the order book you pay 0.00075 Bitcoin in fees
[2016-07-22 04:27:17] Skuffone : thank you so fee plus funding
[2016-07-22 04:27:41] BitMEX_Wally : Yes, the funding rate varies, currently 0.0128% every 8 hours
[2016-07-22 04:28:03] Skuffone : it is the funding i'm finding it hard to work out - that helps thanks
[2016-07-22 04:28:15] BitMEX_Wally : So if you were long 1 Bitcoin you would paid 0.000128 Bitcoin in 7.5 hours time
[2016-07-22 04:28:30] BitMEX_Wally : If you were short you would receive 0.000128 Bitcoin
[2016-07-22 04:29:47] Skuffone : thanks
[2016-07-22 04:32:38] Skuffone : so the difference between my unrealized and realized PNL is the funding?
[2016-07-22 04:33:37] BitMEX_Wally : Trading fees and funding affect your realised PNL immediately
[2016-07-22 04:34:00] BitMEX_Wally : Unrealised PNL is moved to realised PNL every 24 hours
[2016-07-22 04:34:36] BitMEX_Wally : If you had unrealised PNL and realised PNL you get your total life-to-date PNL
[2016-07-22 04:35:11] Skuffone : add you mean
[2016-07-22 04:35:12] BitMEX_Wally : Sorry, if you ADD unrealised PNL and realised PNL together
[2016-07-22 04:35:17] Skuffone : yeah I follow
[2016-07-22 04:35:20] BitMEX_Wally : :)
[2016-07-22 04:35:59] Skuffone : cool - been a while since i position traded on here
[2016-07-22 05:48:06] elmorte : Thanks for the yuan rate @Rado. Did rapid call in sick today?
[2016-07-22 07:23:36] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETHXBT`: Buy 122 @ 0.01921
[2016-07-22 08:21:36] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETHXBT`: Buy 1088 @ 0.01934
[2016-07-22 08:51:51] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETHXBT`: Buy 64 @ 0.01945
[2016-07-22 08:57:07] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETHXBT`: Buy 800 @ 0.01957
[2016-07-22 08:57:07] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETHXBT`: Buy 125 @ 0.01958