This is a mirror of the original BitMEX trollbox archive that used to be online here.
BitMEX disabled their archive after the DDOS attack so I have decided to make my mirror publicly available.

Well now, a few days after I made this mirror available to the public, the original archive from BitMEX is online again.
But since it is still limited (neutered to the last few hundred messages) I will keep my FULL mirror alive.

You have access to more than 50 million trollbox posts. This is more than 7 gigabyte of data hosted on a $5 server so please be patient or consider a donation

<<  >>  English  中文  Русский  한국어  日本語  Español  Français 
[2016-04-05 14:47:16] rapidtrades : they have mt4 which is slighting fast compared to browser tech
[2016-04-05 14:47:52] rapidtrades : any 3rd party software thats bitmex compatible?
[2016-04-05 14:48:00] rapidtrades : maybe i can use that instead
[2016-04-05 14:48:15] BitMEX_Sam : Yeah, vbmithr was working on Sierra Chart compatibility through DTC
[2016-04-05 14:48:21] BitMEX_Sam : Not sure of the status but he had pricing data going through it at least
[2016-04-05 14:48:27] BitMEX_Sam : http://bitsouk.com/
[2016-04-05 14:49:10] rapidtrades : tnx
[2016-04-05 14:56:24] hitme1 : All i can say is i've never had lagging problems on a 2009 macbook with 4gb RAM, using chrome
[2016-04-05 14:56:49] hitme1 : mid-2010* sorry, still old
[2016-04-05 16:19:44] rapidtrades : hitme1: who the f are u pleb
[2016-04-05 16:19:52] rapidtrades : first time im seeing u here
[2016-04-05 16:36:48] sleger : why do you call everyone pleb. You're the only one here with a pre-Pentium area laptop
[2016-04-05 16:37:39] sleger : no problem either with macbook pro 2015 with 16gb of ram btw
[2016-04-05 16:51:49] rapidtrades : oh a 16 gb ram...clearly that's standard and not at all high-end
[2016-04-05 16:52:55] rapidtrades : maybe i should buy a new PC and just f*cking log it on airplanes
[2016-04-05 16:55:26] rapidtrades : hell even 8gb isn't standard on most new ultrabooks
[2016-04-05 17:02:10] sleger : 8gb is the min on a new pc
[2016-04-05 17:05:45] hitme1 : rapidtrades: get REKT
[2016-04-05 17:31:21] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETH7D`: Sell 30 @ 0.02509
[2016-04-05 17:31:36] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETH7D`: Sell 3 @ 0.02508 :punch: :whale:
[2016-04-05 17:36:36] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETH7D`: Sell 2030 @ 0.02466
[2016-04-05 17:44:16] uiop : SOME FOLKS ARE SELLING THE ETHERBUX
[2016-04-05 17:44:49] uiop : moment of truth for if another downleg
[2016-04-05 17:45:00] uiop : (on 1min chart)
[2016-04-05 17:47:41] uiop : still moment of truthing
[2016-04-05 17:59:48] BTCVIX : nip: you there
[2016-04-05 18:02:35] uiop : zzzzzzz
[2016-04-05 18:03:36] BTCVIX : nip: I am not sure there is an exact liquidation price considering they use the "fair market pricing" system
[2016-04-05 18:06:29] nip : BTCVIX: I understand the fair market pricing and think its perfectly reasonable.
[2016-04-05 18:06:55] BTCVIX : nip: at least what you are explaining to me it sounds like you are correct though
[2016-04-05 18:08:55] nip : I'm sure I am, and everyone I have mentioned it to has agreed so far.
[2016-04-05 18:09:07] Bauer : BTC has been quite bullish
[2016-04-05 18:09:22] j8 : nip: were they on cross margin or isolated?
[2016-04-05 18:09:25] Bauer : I wonder what happens when china wakes up
[2016-04-05 18:09:35] nip : j8: cross
[2016-04-05 18:10:01] j8 : if you have multiple positions on cross, the liquidation price can change
[2016-04-05 18:10:09] BTCVIX : nip: have you spoken to Sam , Arthur or Wally about it ? and what have they said ?
[2016-04-05 18:10:21] tscha : nip: I agree it's more reasonable and they should change it. But did they claim something else at some point?
[2016-04-05 18:10:44] habibi : btw u get liquidated on all positions or only first that reached liquidation price?
[2016-04-05 18:11:19] nip : i spoke to wally and arthur, they agreed it was due to open orders, i was liquidated on one of my 3 positions
[2016-04-05 18:12:00] habibi : open orders or positions?
[2016-04-05 18:12:16] nip : open orders
[2016-04-05 18:12:32] BTCVIX : nip: did you find anything in the documents
[2016-04-05 18:13:09] habibi : oh i thought they are just cancelled to make spare funds to cover more margin
[2016-04-05 18:13:26] BTCVIX : habibi: that was my understanding as well
[2016-04-05 18:13:33] nip : habibi: thats what i expected
[2016-04-05 18:13:46] tscha : Did they ever claim that? I don't think so
[2016-04-05 18:14:30] BTCVIX : Margin Call Excess Margin dips below 0% THEN 0% < Excess Margin < Target Excess Margin Close all open orders. Unable to open new positions. Unable to increase existing positions.
[2016-04-05 18:14:43] BitMEX_Sam : That's true on the XBU contracts because they are portfolio margined, but DPE contracts use a different system
[2016-04-05 18:14:47] BTCVIX : only apply to BitMEX XBU
[2016-04-05 18:15:18] BTCVIX : might want to make that clear @BitMEX_Sam as your documents suck to put it lightly
[2016-04-05 18:15:34] BitMEX_Sam : Thanks BTCVIX :+1:
[2016-04-05 18:15:41] BTCVIX : no problem
[2016-04-05 18:15:47] nip : i was seriously debating filling my own liquidation order as i had several times the margin needed to do so
[2016-04-05 18:15:51] nip : that was a strange position to be in
[2016-04-05 18:16:23] BTCVIX : as you could see your liquidation on the books just sitting there -- and you thought about opening a position in to it ?
[2016-04-05 18:16:31] nip : yeah
[2016-04-05 18:16:39] BTCVIX : that is an interesting situation to be in
[2016-04-05 18:16:48] nip : i had about 10 btc available and it would have taken under 3 to hold the position
[2016-04-05 18:17:34] j8 : BitMEX_Sam: so on DPE contracts, open orders aren't canceled before forced liquidation?
[2016-04-05 18:17:43] BitMEX_Sam : Not on other contracts
[2016-04-05 18:17:46] BTCVIX : j8: that is correct
[2016-04-05 18:18:32] habibi : BitMEX_Sam: any serious reason why is that?
[2016-04-05 18:18:39] j8 : on cross margin they really should be.
[2016-04-05 18:18:55] nip : orders are more likely to get you liquidated than positions as initial margin is higher than maintenance margin requirement!
[2016-04-05 18:19:16] BTCVIX : nip: this is a really good point ^^
[2016-04-05 18:19:43] BTCVIX : don't worry I am sure BitMEX Sam has an answer for us
[2016-04-05 18:19:52] BitMEX_Sam : The issue has to do with the comprehensive risk checks we run, and the time they take - we are planning to support canceling orders in other contracts soon
[2016-04-05 18:20:04] BTCVIX : "soon"
[2016-04-05 18:20:12] BTCVIX : yes ... very "soon"
[2016-04-05 18:20:20] BTCVIX : but glad you are "working on it"
[2016-04-05 18:20:34] nip : BitMEX_Sam: maint_margin > margin_balance ?
[2016-04-05 18:20:39] nip : takes 1 cycle at most
[2016-04-05 18:21:01] BitMEX_Sam : It doesn't, because orders would need to canceled one by one and the full portfolio remargined
[2016-04-05 18:21:02] BTCVIX : at the very least I do think that should be articulated in the documents -- I am not seeing much on the DPE FAQ in regards to that
[2016-04-05 18:21:16] BitMEX_Sam : The FAQ makes it clear that once a position reaches the liquidation price, it is liquidated
[2016-04-05 18:21:36] BitMEX_Sam : Liquidation price is made quite prominent.
[2016-04-05 18:21:40] BTCVIX : but you should do more to distinguish the differences in contracts
[2016-04-05 18:22:04] tscha : Though I gotta say that I don't understand why someone would just expect the system cancelling orders automatically, when there is no mention about it in the docs. Pretty risky gamble.
[2016-04-05 18:22:26] BTCVIX : nip: appears to have made an honest mistake -- I am sure if he was aware of the protocol being DIFFERENT then he wouldn't have had open orders
[2016-04-05 18:23:09] BTCVIX : tscha: it mentions it on the other docs that are labeled MARGIN CALL ?LIQUIDATION -- so I can see from UI UX standpoint how people would confuse this
[2016-04-05 18:23:34] nip : i believe the dpe docs reference maintenance margin as well
[2016-04-05 18:24:06] nip : the result was me being forced out of my eth position at 0.02902 and making a large donation to the insurance fund
[2016-04-05 18:24:23] BTCVIX : the idea is to .... welll.. be transparent ... that means being CLEAR about how things work -- I think it is a little confusing having a page labeled that and then one for DPE -- most people that come on have no idea what DPE is so it easily get confused where those rules apply
[2016-04-05 18:25:29] BitMEX_Sam : It quite clearly states that the below rules only apply for XBU and to see the other doc for DPE rules
[2016-04-05 18:25:39] BTCVIX : to me it just looks like they were lazy and didn't want to re-write the document FAQs properly
[2016-04-05 18:25:46] BTCVIX : it is more like a footnote
[2016-04-05 18:26:12] BTCVIX : BitMEX_Sam: sure -- but people are confused so that UI UX issue that is on the exchange
[2016-04-05 18:26:15] nip : BitMEX will specify an initial and maintenance margin for each contract. For example, a contract with 25x leverage will have a 4% initial margin and 1% maintenance margin. If the maintenance margin level is breached, the trader will be liquidated at their bankruptcy price.
[2016-04-05 18:26:28] nip : that is what the other doc says, correct?
[2016-04-05 18:26:33] tscha : nip: where in the docs do you get an impression that open orders are canceled before liquidation?
[2016-04-05 18:26:48] nip : tscha: because every other futures exchange in the history of the world does that
[2016-04-05 18:27:46] BTCVIX : nip: well I wouldn't assume bitmex is the same -- they are a parimutal betting platform at least with DPE -- but I just think the docs should be clearer on this
[2016-04-05 18:28:42] tscha : nip: ok. just wanted to check if there is a mistake / false impression in the docs, because from what I see, there isn't
[2016-04-05 18:28:56] tscha : though I agree that it should be changed and open orders should be canceled
[2016-04-05 18:28:59] j8 : tscha: on the page https://www.bitmex.com/app/marginCall , but there's a note that that only applies to XBU
[2016-04-05 18:29:08] BitMEX_Sam : I'm going to make the docs more clear on this.
[2016-04-05 18:29:16] nip : tscha this is what the dpe doc says
[2016-04-05 18:29:17] nip : "BitMEX will specify an initial and maintenance margin for each contract. For example, a contract with 25x leverage will have a 4% initial margin and 1% maintenance margin. If the maintenance margin level is breached, the trader will be liquidated at their bankruptcy price."
[2016-04-05 18:29:21] BTCVIX : BitMEX_Sam: has the world ended ?
[2016-04-05 18:29:23] BTCVIX : wow
[2016-04-05 18:29:32] nip : my maintenance margin level was not breached
[2016-04-05 18:29:37] BTCVIX : making things more clear -- applause please
[2016-04-05 18:30:01] BitMEX_Sam : nip: It was, your excess margin was less than the maintenance margin requirement
[2016-04-05 18:30:20] BitMEX_Sam : Rather, you had 0 excess margin
[2016-04-05 18:30:55] BTCVIX : BitMEX_Sam: I see your point but making things clearer should avoid this situation in the future
[2016-04-05 18:31:03] BitMEX_Sam : :+1:
[2016-04-05 18:32:39] BTCVIX : nip: I definitely understand your confusion -- hopefully this works out for you -- if I were @BitMEX_Sam I would probably reach out to as a user in a good faith effort and offer some form of reprive -- you sound like you really want to use the platform more and are interested -- just got confused and burned on this one thing
[2016-04-05 18:42:38] BTCVIX : BitMEX_Sam: also only 1 contract series use that system highlighted under "Margin Call and Liquidation" -- how many series do you have now ? 7d, 24hr, 48hr, ETH, FACT, A50 ? so 1/7 of the contracts used that system yet it is the most likely thing someone is going to click on when they have questions about margin call/liqiudation
[2016-04-05 18:43:15] BitMEX_Sam : Yeah, that's a good point - I'll split the docs out. Things have changed so much on the platform that the docs have gotten a bit disorganized
[2016-04-05 18:43:39] BitMEX_Sam : The series are by rootSymbol btw - so XBU, XBT, ETH, FCT, A50
[2016-04-05 18:43:55] BTCVIX : BitMEX_Sam: agreed -- good that you recognize how this can lead to confusion
[2016-04-05 18:44:50] BTCVIX : but yeah so XBU vs XBT, ETH, FCT, A50 -- only the one using the non-DPE system -- I am not going to beat this anymore -- you seem to understand
[2016-04-05 20:16:09] BitMEX_Sam : Reworked the structure of the docs, new starting point at https://www.bitmex.com/app/tradingOverview and a clearer distinction between most contracts and XBU
[2016-04-05 20:59:36] uiop : eth banga incoming
[2016-04-05 21:01:51] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETH7D`: Sell 978 @ 0.02449
[2016-04-05 21:04:28] uiop : we got some srs moment of truthing rite here
[2016-04-05 21:04:31] uiop : yessir
[2016-04-05 21:04:43] uiop : https://cryptowat.ch/poloniex/ethbtc/1m
[2016-04-05 21:16:49] uiop : it's a nailbiter
[2016-04-05 21:22:23] uiop : TICK TOCK
[2016-04-05 21:56:22] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETH7D`: Sell 12 @ 0.02433
[2016-04-05 22:05:07] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETH7D`: Sell 290 @ 0.02424
[2016-04-05 22:08:58] uiop : SOME
[2016-04-05 22:09:00] uiop : FOLKS
[2016-04-05 22:09:00] uiop : ARE
[2016-04-05 22:09:02] uiop : SELLING
[2016-04-05 22:13:58] chessnut : woop wooop
[2016-04-05 22:14:08] habibi : awsome
[2016-04-05 22:14:21] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETH7D`: Sell 16 @ 0.02387
[2016-04-05 22:15:15] chessnut : i just came to short
[2016-04-05 22:15:56] habibi : a little bit risky place to do but yea hope it will futher
[2016-04-05 22:21:36] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETH7D`: Buy 105 @ 0.02449
[2016-04-05 22:21:54] nip : REKT: really...?
[2016-04-05 22:22:15] chessnut : is REKT a bot?
[2016-04-05 22:22:42] nip : no, REKT is the guy who liquidates shorts on ETH7D
[2016-04-05 22:22:55] chessnut : cool
[2016-04-05 22:22:58] BitMEX_Sam : chessnut: :) It's a bot
[2016-04-05 22:22:59] nip : very cool
[2016-04-05 22:23:06] BitMEX_Sam : He's connected to our websocket liquidation feed
[2016-04-05 22:23:12] BitMEX_Sam : Run by the user @micmix
[2016-04-05 22:23:16] chessnut : hehe thought so
[2016-04-05 22:23:42] BitMEX_Sam : We were going to add our own feed, but he got to it before we had the development time to implement it ourselves - he injects a bit of humor into it, which we enjoy
[2016-04-05 22:24:30] uiop : lmao https://cryptowat.ch/bitfinex/ethusd/1m
[2016-04-05 22:24:31] uiop : FINEX DOESNT KNOW WHAT TO THINK
[2016-04-05 22:27:26] chessnut : poor old REKT always getting liquidated
[2016-04-05 22:36:20] Cryptolicious : who wants to buy here
[2016-04-05 22:41:45] chessnut : i really dig the custom deposit addresses
[2016-04-05 22:42:01] chessnut : 1BMEX
[2016-04-05 22:42:04] chessnut : lol
[2016-04-05 22:42:41] BitMEX_Sam : chessnut: 3BMEX :)
[2016-04-05 22:43:03] chessnut : even better =D
[2016-04-05 22:43:41] BitMEX_Sam : We're actually, as far as I know, one of the only if not the only organization that does vanity multisig addresses
[2016-04-05 22:43:47] BitMEX_Sam : Wally did a fork to vanitygen himself
[2016-04-05 22:44:13] chessnut : lol
[2016-04-05 22:56:36] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETH7D`: Buy 49 @ 0.02468
[2016-04-05 23:08:47] Cryptolicious : giant spread
[2016-04-05 23:57:09] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : Is the .05% settlement fee charged on a XBT48H position when it rolls over to XBT24H?
[2016-04-06 01:32:29] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : BitMEX_Sam: ?
[2016-04-06 01:57:37] vbmithr : Hey
[2016-04-06 01:57:54] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : Hey how goes it?
[2016-04-06 02:20:42] BitMEX_Wally : IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb: There is no settlement fee when XBT48H becomes XBT24H.
[2016-04-06 02:21:01] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : BitMEX_Wally: Thanks!
[2016-04-06 02:26:43] micmix : BitMEX_Wally: I see that you started to re-balance XBT48H. Is it re-balanced at 24H settled price?
[2016-04-06 02:36:23] BitMEX_Wally : micmix: No, that wouldn't be fair
[2016-04-06 02:36:36] BitMEX_Wally : micmix: It is rebalanced at the XBT48H mark price, and then XBT24H inherits that mark price
[2016-04-06 02:37:07] micmix : can I see re-balance price somewhere?
[2016-04-06 02:37:20] BitMEX_Wally : https://www.bitmex.com/app/settlementHistory
[2016-04-06 02:37:32] BitMEX_Wally : Also in your Trade History there is now a 'Rebalance' transaction
[2016-04-06 02:41:29] micmix : ok, thanks. You used to show re-balance price on hover over entry price on the sidebar but it doesn't work anymore. I guess I'll have to ping BitMEX_Sam tomorrow
[2016-04-06 02:44:11] BitMEX_Wally : Well spotted, I'll raise a ticket
[2016-04-06 02:44:34] BitMEX_Sam : That's not a bug -
[2016-04-06 02:44:39] BitMEX_Sam : There is that arrow icon, click it
[2016-04-06 02:45:09] micmix : BitMEX_Sam: ah cool, thanks
[2016-04-06 02:45:38] BitMEX_Sam : Perhaps this is not quite evident enough
[2016-04-06 02:46:46] micmix : IMHO re-balance for XBT48H makes it a bit more complicated for regular users
[2016-04-06 02:47:53] micmix : unrealized PNL doesn't match entry price shown in the UI anymore. most users don't trade quarterly and didn't have to deal with re-balancing before
[2016-04-06 02:48:49] micmix : just my 2 coins :-) I understand that you are doing it for our benefit, to release our profits
[2016-04-06 02:49:39] micmix : well most users don't trade 48H either, so maybe it's not a concern
[2016-04-06 02:50:59] micmix : BitMEX_Sam: that arrow icon looks like 'swap', maybe something like 'info' would be better
[2016-04-06 02:58:56] BitMEX_Sam : :+1: That's a good suggestion
[2016-04-06 03:02:49] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : :bitcoin:
[2016-04-06 03:03:15] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : `test`
[2016-04-06 03:03:23] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : `:bitcoin:`
[2016-04-06 03:03:33] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : Had to figure out how I did that again
[2016-04-06 03:04:22] BitMEX_Sam : IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb: See http://www.emoji-cheat-sheet.com/
[2016-04-06 03:04:28] BitMEX_Sam : Most of those should work here.
[2016-04-06 03:17:10] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : :smirk:
[2016-04-06 03:17:12] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : Cool
[2016-04-06 03:17:50] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : My trading balance :chart_with_downwards_trend:
[2016-04-06 04:07:16] BitMEX_Arthur : Anyone who is interested in providing feedback on contract terms for our exchange default futures please send me an email arthur@bitmex.com
[2016-04-06 04:19:00] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : BitMEX_Arthur: Is there a survey of some sort or just any feedback in general?
[2016-04-06 04:29:10] BitMEX_Arthur : IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb: There will be a draft contract terms shared with people over a google docs and then people can comment
[2016-04-06 04:45:04] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : BitMEX_Arthur: Why are the contracts changing?
[2016-04-06 05:10:27] BitMEX_Arthur : IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb: it is a new product that will help traders buy insurance against the default of an exchange
[2016-04-06 05:10:34] BitMEX_Arthur : and other traders will sell it to them
[2016-04-06 05:11:23] mwalshe99 : exchange default?
[2016-04-06 05:11:23] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : Ohh got it. Very cool. I thought you meant default as in the standard contracts like XBT24H
[2016-04-06 05:11:52] mwalshe99 : you guys gonna bet big on your own failure?
[2016-04-06 05:12:11] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : mwalshe99: Other exchanges of course haha, not BitMEX
[2016-04-06 05:12:26] mwalshe99 : oh thank fuck for that
[2016-04-06 05:12:43] mwalshe99 : got reall concerned there
[2016-04-06 05:13:25] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : `:bitcoin:`
[2016-04-06 05:13:39] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : <blink>blink still work</blink>
[2016-04-06 05:13:51] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : Thought that was fixed haha
[2016-04-06 05:20:16] IChTj4OeMavRq6qeIyEb : **:bitcoin:**
[2016-04-06 05:24:10] vbmithr : exchange defualt futures?
[2016-04-06 05:30:18] nip : vbmithr: for example it might settle at 1 btc if the woodchipper gets goxed by september and settle at 0 otherwise
[2016-04-06 05:30:30] nip : at least thats what i assume we're talking about
[2016-04-06 05:44:33] BitMEX_Arthur : nip: yes the question is what constitutes a default
[2016-04-06 05:45:34] BitMEX_Arthur : We floated the idea a while back but now Wally is working on implementin them in the trading engine
[2016-04-06 05:50:52] miramm1115 : BitMEX_Arthur: how about a contract for okc socialized losses, so we could insurance against clawbacks
[2016-04-06 05:51:06] miramm1115 : * buy insurance
[2016-04-06 06:25:03] splash : BitMEX_Arthur: is there short keys for opening the calculator?
[2016-04-06 06:25:12] BitMEX_Arthur : miramm1115: not likely to appear here as we would rather you just trade our futures product
[2016-04-06 06:25:25] BitMEX_Arthur : splash: not that I'm aware of I'll ask Sam
[2016-04-06 06:25:35] splash : BitMEX_Arthur: it would be real nice to have :)
[2016-04-06 06:25:37] splash : :)
[2016-04-06 06:26:00] miramm1115 : BitMEX_Arthur: fair point
[2016-04-06 06:27:35] splash : BitMEX_Arthur: Ive got another request. I personally always think in percentage points when I calc my risk. It would be super nice if I could insert my risk, in percentage, and have the calculator calc how many contracts I should work with
[2016-04-06 06:28:42] splash : i.e. instead of inuting number of contracts and have the calc tell me how many bitcoins i will loose, it would be nice if I can say how many bitcoins I can accept loosing and then have the calc outputing how many contracts i should work with
[2016-04-06 06:30:04] splash : BitMEX_Arthur: when clicking the Profis/Loss field, it could turn into an input field and the contract input turns into ordinary text. that would do it for me
[2016-04-06 07:37:46] Kahuna : factom going down. shorting to motha :-)
[2016-04-06 08:24:01] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBT24H`: Sell 400 @ 421.68
[2016-04-06 08:52:32] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBT24H`: Sell 4700 @ 421.21
[2016-04-06 09:03:51] Kahuna : bye bye factom. please go to zero
[2016-04-06 09:19:21] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETH7D`: Buy 2200 @ 0.02497
[2016-04-06 09:20:36] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETH7D`: Buy 55 @ 0.02511
[2016-04-06 09:20:51] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETH7D`: Buy 251 @ 0.02515
[2016-04-06 09:27:07] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETH7D`: Buy 99 @ 0.02548
[2016-04-06 09:53:21] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETH7D`: Buy 2 @ 0.02580 :punch: :whale:
[2016-04-06 11:37:49] Bauer : How can the sell price in my liquidation be lower than the lowest price in markets?
[2016-04-06 11:39:27] Bauer : The forced sell in my liquidation was at 419.09 and lowest sells at that time were 420.98 =o
[2016-04-06 11:41:03] Bauer : If charts here are correct
[2016-04-06 11:41:20] BombaUcigasa : DPE
[2016-04-06 11:41:26] j8 : then it got filled on the way to 419.09
[2016-04-06 11:42:34] BitMEX_Arthur : Bauer: You close out order is filled at your bankruptcy price, which is lower than your liquidation price
[2016-04-06 11:43:49] BitMEX_Arthur : The trading engine then attempts to close your order out in the market better than the bankruptcy price
[2016-04-06 11:44:28] Bauer : Ok.. So basically at liquidation every penny is gone it seems?
[2016-04-06 11:45:15] Bauer : That is in the contracts
[2016-04-06 11:49:54] BitMEX_Wally : Yes, the position and any remaining margin is taken over by the system and closed out.
[2016-04-06 11:50:08] BitMEX_Wally : https://www.bitmex.com/app/dynamicProfitEqualisation
[2016-04-06 14:05:41] nip : does anyone here trade the factom futures?
[2016-04-06 14:13:37] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETH7D`: Sell 25 @ 0.02515
[2016-04-06 14:15:33] BitMEX_Greg : nip: What are your thoughts about Factom anyway?
[2016-04-06 14:33:49] nip : BitMEX_Greg: no idea what it is. i just want to trade it long or short either way!
[2016-04-06 14:37:43] nip : i wish there were longer dated futures for ETH A50 and FCT
[2016-04-06 14:37:57] nip : also it is impossible to roll right now
[2016-04-06 14:54:05] sleger : yes it's true, there is so much liquidity on a50 for instance that we should split it across multiple maturities
[2016-04-06 14:59:10] nip : i'd like to hold long term positions in alts here
[2016-04-06 14:59:40] nip : quarterlies would be ideal
[2016-04-06 15:01:03] j8 : wow 6 days since the last trade on A50
[2016-04-06 15:01:21] nip : 111 btc in open interest isnt too bad though
[2016-04-06 15:03:55] seaplusplus : my open orders are not showing on the chart
[2016-04-06 15:03:58] seaplusplus : how can I fix that
[2016-04-06 15:03:58] seaplusplus : ?
[2016-04-06 15:07:53] BitMEX_Wally : seaplusplus: They might be quite low down. Scale the chart by dragging the price axis
[2016-04-06 15:22:45] BitMEX_Greg : nip: What type of length would you be happy with for a longer term contract on ETH?
[2016-04-06 15:23:26] nip : quarterly would be ideal
[2016-04-06 15:23:45] nip : in the current weekly only format it is impossible to manage a long term position
[2016-04-06 15:23:59] BitMEX_Greg : Leverage would need to be toned down however given the volatility
[2016-04-06 15:24:50] nip : yeah that makes sense
[2016-04-06 15:25:18] BitMEX_Greg : Do you usually trade with the 25x max leverage anyway?
[2016-04-06 15:25:52] nip : no
[2016-04-06 15:26:26] nip : i use cross margin and dont plan on being liquidated
[2016-04-06 15:26:49] BitMEX_Greg : Right,
[2016-04-06 15:26:51] nip : lower leverage would be fine
[2016-04-06 15:27:20] BitMEX_Greg : I'll run it past the guys, see what type of leverage we can utilise for a quarterly
[2016-04-06 15:31:10] j8 : i figure it would be hard to get liquidity on an eth quarterly. it would be super volatile
[2016-04-06 15:35:13] nip : i would be happy with some liquidity some of the time
[2016-04-06 15:38:47] BitMEX_Greg : That's my concern, a quarterly contract would be difficult. Bitcoin has an established forward curve already. However, if there is interest in a quarterly then we can take a look into it
[2016-04-06 15:39:53] nip : its not a quanto series so it shouldnt be too difficult to value
[2016-04-06 15:43:34] j8 : i guess the volatile premiums partly come from high leverage, the old XBU quarterlies never got bought up like on okc
[2016-04-06 17:15:04] mpkomara : ANYONE RIDIN SPINNERS?
[2016-04-06 17:15:35] nip : mpkomara: name a market and i will trade either side of it
[2016-04-06 17:15:42] nip : except for xbu of course
[2016-04-06 17:17:00] mpkomara : https://poloniex.com/exchange#btc_cga
[2016-04-06 17:17:09] mpkomara : i want this added
[2016-04-06 17:17:14] mpkomara : i LOVE enjoyable gambles
[2016-04-06 17:18:30] nip : i would rather see monero added
[2016-04-06 17:22:29] habibi : i would rather see altmex in general with more shitcoins to trade :p
[2016-04-06 17:24:14] mpkomara : i love shitcoins
[2016-04-06 17:24:19] mpkomara : its like surfing
[2016-04-06 17:29:57] aaa10247 : can you lend out eth or btc on bitmex to other traders for interest?
[2016-04-06 17:36:55] BitMEX_Wally : No, but you can short a future and earn the basis.
[2016-04-06 17:37:07] BitMEX_Wally : For example XBTU16 is trading at $534
[2016-04-06 17:39:55] BitMEX_Wally : So if you sold the future at $534 and bought spot at $421 and hold until expiry in September you are effectively earning 50% interest rate on a per annum basis
[2016-04-06 17:41:11] aaa10247 : got it. thank you. will look into this further.
[2016-04-06 17:57:59] sleger : BitMEX_Wally: that is not true
[2016-04-06 17:58:04] sleger : prices can move
[2016-04-06 17:58:12] sleger : and the hedge does not work
[2016-04-06 17:58:14] BitMEX_Wally : Yes, you have to hedge your short USD gamma
[2016-04-06 17:58:20] sleger : shouldnt say that to newbs
[2016-04-06 18:00:37] arbitrage001 : anyone who trade without doing homework
[2016-04-06 18:01:17] arbitrage001 : get what they deserve
[2016-04-06 18:04:56] messiaen8844 : check out BitMEX blog for arbitrage webinars, good stuff
[2016-04-06 19:10:55] BTCVIX : BitMEX_Sam: yeah I see you added that (Start Here) section and clarified that Margin call section at current is (XBU) series only) this is good. At some time though probably have to do a complete overhaul of the docs and come up with a good way to compare and contract etc.
[2016-04-06 20:34:44] seaplusplus : VIX do you even trade here?
[2016-04-06 21:09:00] BombaUcigasa : No, but probably his shilldren do
[2016-04-06 21:34:35] seaplusplus : lol
[2016-04-06 22:54:35] j8 : index and mark price are nowhere to be seen on advanced view..
[2016-04-06 23:30:51] Cawley22 : Is there a wrong answer for "Please select a country of residence before depositing" .....
[2016-04-06 23:35:39] BombaUcigasa : Yes
[2016-04-07 00:58:40] BitMEX_Wally : We cannot accept US residents
[2016-04-07 01:21:06] darius177 : mpkomara:
[2016-04-07 01:22:12] nip : lets trade!
[2016-04-07 01:31:10] BitMEX_Sam : j8: Apologies for that, if you refresh you'll be able to scroll the sidebar again
[2016-04-07 01:33:43] j8 : still don't see it
[2016-04-07 01:34:51] BitMEX_Sam : If you have the orderbook in 'dual' mode, it's in the sidebar
[2016-04-07 01:34:59] BitMEX_Sam : If you have it in single-column mode, it's in the middle of the orderbook
[2016-04-07 01:36:45] dropixx : why can't you accept U.S residents?
[2016-04-07 01:39:41] BitMEX_Wally : dropixx: We are not licensed by the CFTC
[2016-04-07 01:40:57] j8 : BitMEX_Sam: ah, i had to toggle it back and forth to get it in the sidebar on dual
[2016-04-07 01:42:19] dropixx : why don't you get certified
[2016-04-07 01:45:00] dropixx : it's probably complicated..but your site is cool. hopefully one day it will be available to US residents
[2016-04-07 01:48:15] BitMEX_Wally : dropixx: Yes, the cost of being licensed is quite high and the number of US customers is not enough to justify it yet
[2016-04-07 01:51:40] miramm1115 : BitMEX_Wally: as far as I remember you were showing mark price and estimated settle price on the sidebar. I don't see it anymore
[2016-04-07 01:51:55] miramm1115 : under contract details
[2016-04-07 01:58:03] BitMEX_Wally : Refresh the page
[2016-04-07 01:58:21] BitMEX_Wally : `Contract Details: XBT24H 421.23 421.72/ 421.62`
[2016-04-07 01:58:32] BitMEX_Wally : First number is the last traded price
[2016-04-07 01:58:48] BitMEX_Wally : Second number is the underlying price (i.e. indicative settle price)
[2016-04-07 01:58:53] BitMEX_Wally : Third number is the mark price
[2016-04-07 02:03:24] miramm1115 : BitMEX_Wally: this is how it looks on my screen: http://imgur.com/25ttHjp
[2016-04-07 02:04:50] BitMEX_Wally : miramm1115: Hmmm
[2016-04-07 02:06:08] miramm1115 : BitMEX_Wally: it's not urgent, maybe BitMEX_Sam will take a look when he has time
[2016-04-07 02:07:35] j8 : miramm1115: i had to switch the orderbook to Single and back to Dual to get it to show up
[2016-04-07 02:07:50] BitMEX_Wally : Yes, it is not shown when the Order book is in Single column mode
[2016-04-07 02:08:12] miramm1115 : j8: thanks, it did show up
[2016-04-07 02:08:39] miramm1115 : BitMEX_Wally: it was in dual
[2016-04-07 02:09:11] BitMEX_Wally : Yeah we were not detecting the initial state correctly
[2016-04-07 02:09:14] BitMEX_Wally : We will fix
[2016-04-07 02:09:29] miramm1115 : thanks, all good! @BitMEX_Wally
[2016-04-07 02:33:01] nip : anyone want to trade china and factom?
[2016-04-07 02:33:11] nip : doesnt seem to be much action there
[2016-04-07 02:41:04] BitMEX_Wally : Someone has registered a BitMEX affiliate page for a product we do not even have: http://www.shcomp.co
[2016-04-07 02:42:05] BitMEX_Wally : @ETHXBT: You cannot trade the Shanghai Composite on BitMEX, you must be confused
[2016-04-07 02:46:54] BitMEX_Arthur : nip: If you want a price on China let me know
[2016-04-07 02:53:45] mpkomara : nip: I DONT EVEN KNOW WHAT A FACTOM IS HONK HONK
[2016-04-07 04:11:42] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBT24H`: Sell 1640 @ 419.65
[2016-04-07 04:14:22] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBT7D`: Sell 1500 @ 419.29
[2016-04-07 04:14:22] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBT7D`: Sell 5000 @ 419.30
[2016-04-07 04:14:22] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBT24H`: Sell 500 @ 419.36
[2016-04-07 04:14:26] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBT7D`: Sell 215 @ 418.94
[2016-04-07 04:14:26] REKT : :btc: :soon: :toilet:
[2016-04-07 04:14:26] REKT : Liquidated long on `XBT7D`: Sell 155 @ 418.69
[2016-04-07 09:00:54] stevelim : Hi, You seem to eliminate spot/fair price under Contract details, is it on purpose?
[2016-04-07 09:02:08] stevelim : Where can I see them easily? Now it is very hard to see them, especially on mobile.
[2016-04-07 09:05:11] BitMEX_Wally : stevelim: It's a bug. Toggle the order book single/double column setting
[2016-04-07 09:06:09] BitMEX_Wally : If you have Single order book then the spot/fair price appears in the middle of the order book. If you have Dual order book then it appears in Contract Details
[2016-04-07 09:06:14] mathewpk13 : what do you guys think about going long today
[2016-04-07 09:08:33] stevelim : I had Dual order book, it didn't show under contract details, changed to single order book and change back to dual, now it shows under Contract details
[2016-04-07 09:11:01] BitMEX_Wally : Cool, we will fix this bug soon
[2016-04-07 09:18:31] mathewpk13 : how to remove indicators from the chart?
[2016-04-07 09:47:03] BitMEX_Wally : Right click then "Reset Chart"
[2016-04-07 09:47:34] BitMEX_Wally : Actually, Right Click then Indicators -> Remove All Indicators
[2016-04-07 10:05:49] mathewpk13 : Thank you
[2016-04-07 10:25:36] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETH7D`: Sell 100 @ 0.02493
[2016-04-07 11:45:17] yerb : BitMEX_Wally: is there any possibility to process my withdraw now?
[2016-04-07 11:45:34] yerb : cuz i gotta transfer funds fast
[2016-04-07 11:46:09] BitMEX_Wally : yerb: Unfortunately BitMEX_Sam is asleep and Arthur is out
[2016-04-07 11:46:21] BitMEX_Wally : Takes at least 2 of us to sign the transaction
[2016-04-07 11:46:34] yerb : ok
[2016-04-07 15:03:35] habibi : hidden order is always executed as last one if there are others orders at same price?
[2016-04-07 15:05:08] BitMEX_Greg : habibi: Hi Habibi, I will find out for you
[2016-04-07 15:05:29] habibi : thanks
[2016-04-07 15:05:36] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETH7D`: Sell 80 @ 0.02446
[2016-04-07 15:06:20] rapidtrades : habibi: hows it goin dude
[2016-04-07 15:06:44] habibi : rapidtrades: good, being bearish on eth is finally profitable
[2016-04-07 15:07:00] rapidtrades : habibi: tnx for telling me after the fcat
[2016-04-07 15:07:04] rapidtrades : fact*
[2016-04-07 15:07:43] habibi : i told u before, last time :)
[2016-04-07 15:08:37] BitMEX_Wally : Hidden orders are executed as usual, i.e. with price them time priority. They just are not visible in the order book feed
[2016-04-07 15:08:49] habibi : understood, thanks
[2016-04-07 15:08:52] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETH7D`: Sell 1180 @ 0.02436
[2016-04-07 15:11:16] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETH7D`: Sell 100 @ 0.02407
[2016-04-07 15:11:51] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETH7D`: Sell 10 @ 0.02406
[2016-04-07 15:13:02] rapidtrades : habibi: maybe...my memorah is pretty bad
[2016-04-07 15:17:12] sleger : so is your laptop's
[2016-04-07 15:20:44] mpkomara : LOL
[2016-04-07 15:21:51] rapidtrades : mpkomara: HONK HONK
[2016-04-07 15:22:13] mpkomara : SUNNY DAY ON THE SS ARBITRAGE
[2016-04-07 15:22:17] mpkomara : LOTS OF FISH
[2016-04-07 15:22:24] mpkomara : HONK HONK
[2016-04-07 15:33:46] nip : mpkomara: you ready to trade factums?
[2016-04-07 15:34:04] mpkomara : nip: i dont even know what a factom is!
[2016-04-07 15:36:09] nip : mpkomara: you sure do talk about them a lot
[2016-04-07 15:36:30] mpkomara : nip: I just like ACTION
[2016-04-07 15:51:39] podizzle3k : whos the derp trying to buy 25 contracts on the roll
[2016-04-07 15:51:47] podizzle3k : get that shit outta there its jacking up the botprices
[2016-04-07 16:13:22] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETH7D`: Sell 300 @ 0.02391
[2016-04-07 16:15:56] alchemist : what the hell is factom
[2016-04-07 16:16:21] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETH7D`: Sell 445 @ 0.02367
[2016-04-07 16:16:40] nip : alchemist: i dont know i just want someone to trade it with me
[2016-04-07 16:16:45] nip : i will long or short either side
[2016-04-07 16:17:06] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETH7D`: Sell 20 @ 0.02358
[2016-04-07 16:17:06] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETH7D`: Sell 6104 @ 0.02357
[2016-04-07 16:18:41] BitMEX_Sam : Factom is a (relatively) popular alt that trades on Poloniex & Bittrex
[2016-04-07 16:18:50] BitMEX_Sam : Their org raised some money last year
[2016-04-07 16:18:50] BitMEX_Sam : http://factom.org/
[2016-04-07 16:20:11] sleger : nip: plenty of quotes why dont you trade if you dont care the side ?
[2016-04-07 16:21:06] REKT : Liquidated long on `ETH7D`: Sell 300 @ 0.02343
[2016-04-07 16:21:35] nip : 1. they are small
[2016-04-07 16:21:42] nip : 2. they are wide
[2016-04-07 16:21:50] nip : 3. they may or may not be my quotes
[2016-04-07 16:22:27] sleger : then you may or may not post tiny wide quotes, maybe or not you should grow balls ;)
[2016-04-07 16:23:08] nip : they should rename this trollbox to the woodchipper
[2016-04-07 16:23:18] nip : it has a way of rewriting and reformatting comments
[2016-04-07 16:28:48] nip : BitMEX_Team: any progress toward listing quarterlies for the non-btc contracts?
[2016-04-07 16:29:15] BitMEX_Wally : We are discussing it right now
[2016-04-07 16:29:29] sleger : wont work...
[2016-04-07 16:29:39] mpkomara : I would love this too !
[2016-04-07 16:29:47] mpkomara : ETH quarterlies would be AWESOME
[2016-04-07 16:29:49] habibi : altmex would be good as a alternative for polo margin trading
[2016-04-07 16:30:03] mpkomara : SHITCOIN QUARTERLIES
[2016-04-07 16:30:09] nip : habibi: that is what brought me here
[2016-04-07 16:30:21] nip : alternative to polo. i just wish i had to way to hold a longer term position
[2016-04-07 16:31:08] BitMEX_Wally : How about `ETH14D` that automatically becomes `ETH7D`?
[2016-04-07 16:31:13] BitMEX_Wally : (like `XBT48H` becomes `XBT24H`)
[2016-04-07 16:31:31] nip : BitMEX_Wally: that would be great as it would allow me to roll
[2016-04-07 16:31:46] mpkomara : I agree, that would be a nice compromise
[2016-04-07 16:31:57] nip : i've had a big problem with my position in ETH going flat every friday. then i get slippage reopening it
[2016-04-07 16:32:21] mpkomara : I would be pretty satisfied with a 14D that becomes 7D
[2016-04-07 16:32:33] nip : maybe you could launch it before the 7D expires tomorrow?
[2016-04-07 16:32:54] sleger : BitMEX_Wally: Will the insurance fund be completely separated between shitcoins and btc ?
[2016-04-07 16:33:41] habibi : sleger i believe actually eth contracts made this fund much bigger than btc liquidations use to donate
[2016-04-07 16:34:11] sleger : habibi: maybe but does it matter ? Are past performance a guarantee of future performances ? NO
[2016-04-07 16:34:36] habibi : so still u heard that btc fund and eth is separate in some way
[2016-04-07 16:34:49] sleger : The insurance fund page only shows one number
[2016-04-07 16:34:50] nip : sleger: I actually like having everything settled in btc and using the same margin/insurance
[2016-04-07 16:35:01] nip : it is very convenient
[2016-04-07 16:35:07] sleger : nip: Of course you do because you are playing shitcoins
[2016-04-07 16:35:22] sleger : it is iin your interest. I am only talking about insurance fund. Margin can stay cross
[2016-04-07 16:35:33] nip : sleger: and i have paid into the insurance fund when i got liquidated due to open orders
[2016-04-07 16:35:38] mpkomara : sleger: you dont play the shitcoins?!
[2016-04-07 16:35:41] nip : sleger: probably about 3btc
[2016-04-07 16:35:55] mpkomara : nip: So have I of course!
[2016-04-07 16:36:14] mpkomara : I am so LIQUID
[2016-04-07 16:36:27] mpkomara : LIQUID'NOG
[2016-04-07 16:36:29] sleger : nip: one day eth or fct or some other new shitcoins are going to create a huge DPE and i dont think players who play btc should have to pay for that
[2016-04-07 16:37:02] mpkomara : sleger: so you are suggesting two pools, one for shitcoin, one for BTC?
[2016-04-07 16:37:12] nip : sleger: you are not more entitled to the insurance fund money than i am
[2016-04-07 16:37:22] sleger : yes and maybe one for china as its different, but anyways nobody trades it
[2016-04-07 16:37:24] nip : sleger: just because i believe in ETH and you believe in BTC
[2016-04-07 16:37:36] sleger : nip: your reasoning is broken
[2016-04-07 16:38:02] nip : the china one will never draw from the insurance fund i expect
[2016-04-07 16:39:02] sleger : for instance 0kcoin has separate pool for btc and ltc.
[2016-04-07 16:39:35] nip : those are actually denominated in btc and ltc
[2016-04-07 16:39:43] sleger : i dont mind using btc as margin for everything but just separate pools . The risk between FCT and BTC is clearly not the same
[2016-04-07 16:39:47] nip : they would have to exchange them themselves to share the pool
[2016-04-07 16:39:56] mpkomara : so Sleger is just guessing that the insurance fund is more likely to be utilized by shitcoin vs BTC, thus he doesnt want to pay into it for shitcoin speculators
[2016-04-07 16:40:20] nip : mpkomara: maintenance margin is higher for alts, so they also pay in more
[2016-04-07 16:40:28] mpkomara : ah
[2016-04-07 16:40:32] nip : mpkomara: it is balanced if maintenance margin is chosen correctly
[2016-04-07 16:40:40] sleger : then they will pay more to their funds thats fine
[2016-04-07 16:40:42] nip : i dont have a crystal ball so i cant say which way it will go
[2016-04-07 16:40:47] sleger : and i wont benefit from it, thats fine
[2016-04-07 16:40:55] nip : but pooling makes it more likely to avoid dpe altogether!
[2016-04-07 16:41:03] nip : that is good for us and good for the exchange
[2016-04-07 16:41:07] sleger : no
[2016-04-07 16:41:20] sleger : it is good for those who are more likely to create dpe
[2016-04-07 16:41:23] nip : woodchipper hasnt had dpe in a long time. i doubt bitmex wants to
[2016-04-07 16:41:28] nip : even if its just on 1 contract
[2016-04-07 16:41:38] nip : sleger: you have never been liquidated?
[2016-04-07 16:41:38] mpkomara : WTF is woodchipper
[2016-04-07 16:41:54] sleger : nip: no, but i dont see how thats relevant anyways
[2016-04-07 16:42:12] nip : mpkomara: try typing the name of the most popular bitcoin exchange
[2016-04-07 16:42:22] mpkomara : I've been liquidated before, I'm not SHY to admit it. SHITCOINS gets ya eventually
[2016-04-07 16:42:24] nip : its also a joke between us in the trading community
[2016-04-07 16:42:24] mpkomara : okcoin
[2016-04-07 16:42:27] mpkomara : okcoin
[2016-04-07 16:42:30] mpkomara : wtf LOL
[2016-04-07 16:45:52] mpkomara : OkayCoin
[2016-04-07 16:46:23] sleger : 0kcoin
[2016-04-07 16:46:57] sleger : if you type very very fast the system doesnt have time to change it @mpkomara
[2016-04-07 16:47:07] nip : mr huobi will never disappoint you
[2016-04-07 16:47:23] nip : anyone remember that hot air balloon that said that on the bitvc homepage?
[2016-04-07 16:47:34] nip : haha they replace that one too
[2016-04-07 16:47:37] nip : huobi
[2016-04-07 16:47:41] nip : fire currency exchange
[2016-04-07 16:47:59] mpkomara : huobi
[2016-04-07 16:48:02] mpkomara : lol wtf
[2016-04-07 16:48:34] mpkomara : Huo bi
[2016-04-07 16:48:55] mpkomara : icbait
[2016-04-07 16:50:07] j8 : i'm with sleger on this one, bitmex should feel free to add whatever garbage people want to trade, but it shouldn't affect DPE risk on bitcoin contracts
[2016-04-07 16:50:47] nip : j8: i actually dont think they should add garbage products
[2016-04-07 16:50:56] nip : eth and fct have real tech behind them
[2016-04-07 16:51:20] nip : fct is the third highest volume alt on polo today
[2016-04-07 16:51:52] habibi : u know 360 btc is still nothing
[2016-04-07 16:52:06] nip : habibi: maybe to you
[2016-04-07 16:52:10] nip : :)
[2016-04-07 16:52:29] habibi : in terms of volume.. yea its nothing for most of traders imo
[2016-04-07 16:59:00] j8 : it's tiny considering people are asking for quarterly futures on it
[2016-04-07 16:59:31] REKT : Liquidated short on `XBT24H`: Buy 6500 @ 422.02
[2016-04-07 17:03:51] REKT : Liquidated short on `ETH7D`: Buy 49 @ 0.02376
[2016-04-07 19:00:59] rapidtrades : ^^^^ this f shitcoin refuses to dieeeeeeeeeeee
[2016-04-07 19:23:48] mpkomara : ETH to 0!
[2016-04-07 19:23:49] mpkomara : HONK HONK
[2016-04-07 19:43:49] cryptokeeper : hey
[2016-04-07 19:44:13] cryptokeeper : why does the bitmex eth price say 2385 when polo is 2373